Tne reason for the decline of newspaper circulation is that 42 million Americans are illiterate and roughly 50 million more are semi-literate, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Christopher Hedges says. What’s more, he adds, 80 percent of U.S. households last year did not buy a book.
“The rates of illiteracy or semi-literacy---meaning people reading at a fourth or fifth grade level---now comprise one-third of the United States,” says Hedges, “and even those who are technically literate opt into a system where they get most of their information through images---images which are of course skillfully manipulated.”
Hedges, a former war correspondent for The New York Times, is quoted in “News Media in Crisis,”(Doukathsan) as saying, “With the decline in newspapers and the decline of a literature culture, American society “is essentially walking into a world of moral nihilism, where we no longer embrace values.”
Newspaper readership has also fallen off because “we have a large, sustained, well-funded set of people out there who attack honest reporting” and who have created “a belief that the news is not to be trusted,” adds David Cay Johnston, like Hedges a former New York Times reporter and Pulitzer Prize winner.
Robert Rosenthal, former editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer and director of the Center for Investigative Reporting, in Berkeley, Calif., said, “I think we all can agree that there is not simply a serious problem, there’s a total crisis, and a disintegration certainly of newspapers and media as we’ve known (them) in our lifetimes.”
From a high of 60,000 newsroom reporters, the number of professional journalists has dwindled to about 50,000, and several hundred newspapers have closed their doors, said Benjamin Compaine, of the Innovation International Media Consulting Group and author of the book “Who Owns The Media?”
Newspapers lost 42 percent of their value during the 2006-07 period, added Rick Edmonds, media analyst for the Poynter Institute of St. Petersburg, Fla., “and then 83 per cent of their remaining value in 2008… We have only one publicly traded newspaper company at higher than $5 a share (The Washington Post) right now, which is mainly valued for its Kaplan Education subsidiary.”
As for the number of working journalists, Edmonds put the figure this year at 47,000 and predicted “(It’s) going to get quite a lot worse (and) is getting worse right now.” He said “there (are) drastic reductions in the space allocated to news. Metro papers, which have the worst of it, are in many cases getting rid of their business sections, their freestanding feature display pages. A lot of readers say, ‘There’s nothing to read in the paper anymore.’”
Hedges said, “What we’re seeing is not just the death of newsprint or the death of print, but the rise in corporate hands of essentially the obliteration and destruction of our open society. Virtually everything that we see, read, and hear is now controlled by roughly eight corporations,” he said, among them Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., Viacom, General Electric, and Disney. Disney, for example, owns ABC Television Network and ESPN besides Disney Channel and Radio Disney.
“They look at their readers as clients. These readers---like all clients which are being sold products by corporations---have to be made happy. They have to be catered to, and the idea that news will be delivered which makes people unsettled or uncomfortable is an anathema to people whose goals are profit,” Hedges said.
Peter Phillips, director of Project Censored, which trains students about defending free press rights, said only five percent of young persons under 30 read a newspaper because “they don’t see anything relevant to their lives.”
Phillips went on to say that at the Media Reform Conference held in Minneapolis in June, 2008, a survey of 376 persons selected at random were asked their views about media today. “Ninety-nine percent agreed with the statement that corporate media has failed to keep the American people informed on important issues facing the nation. We get almost unanimous agreement on that point.”
The book “News Media in Crisis” is based on the conference “Serious Problems Facing The News Media” convened by Dean Lawrence Velvel last March 7-8 at the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover. To obtain copies, contact
landers@mslaw.edu
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
The Massachusetts School of Law is an independent, non-profit law school purposefully dedicated to the education of minority students and those from low-income and immigrant backgrounds who would otherwise not be able to afford a legal education.
The Massachusetts School of Law at Andover is a 21-year-old law school whose pioneering mission is to inexpensively provide rigorous legal education, a pathway into the legal profession, and social mobility to members of the working class, minorities, people in midlife, and immigrants.
Through its television shows, videotaped conferences, an intellectual magazine, and internet postings, MSL - - uniquely for a law school - - also seeks to provide the public with information about crucial legal and non legal subjects facing the country.
this is the short part of it. You can read all of the author's finding in full here http://www.freedomsledder.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=23159
|
I don't know how many people bought books last year, but I know in any good year, only about half the population buys even one. Book stores have been going under in increasing numbers for years.
I do agree that corporate media has homogenized news to the point that either you spend a good deal of time looking stuff up on your own or you ignore it all.
1I still love my paper, but I seem to be the only one. Can't stare at the computer screen too long to read stuff online because I pretty much go cross-eyed after a while.
2"The rates of illiteracy or semi-literacy---meaning people reading at a fourth or fifth grade level---now comprise one-third of the United States"
ONE-THIRD ? What's wrong with you people ?! You're supposed to be the leader of the free world !
It must be a hot topic though because this morning on the radio, I heard a journalist say that the Internet had changed the cultural habits of French people, noticing for example that reading was less popular among young people who preferred surfing the Web. But come on ! our illiteracy rate is still "only" 9%...
(I understand that my comment could be perceived as arrogance, but trust me : I'm appalled because I didn't expect these high numbers. It's more sadness than arrogance, really. Please don't throw rocks at me
).
3I once read that Walter Cronkite drew from a pool of about 21,000 words in his newscasts and that after a couple of years, Dan Rather was down to 7,000.
4@ stephley : very frightening indeed.
5It's the electronic age no time for reading we must be stimulated not educated.
The fact of the matter is that as time marches on more and more things will not only impede our mental discipline in a number of areas but also do things for us on a physical level. We're going to be a bunch of dumb blobs in a hundred years and artificial intelligence is just going to run more and more of our lives. I think the only people that will be left reading are actors, lol.
6@Hypno : and me ! As Victor Hugo (one of the greatest people who ever lived) said once (of course, it sounds a 1000 times better in French, of course, but here's a translation for you guys) :
"Si l'on n'est plus que mille, eh bien, j'en suis ! Si même
Ils ne sont plus que cent, je brave encor Sylla ;
S'il en demeure dix, je serai le dixième ;
Et s'il n'en reste qu'un, je serai celui-là !"
If there are no more than a thousand, well, I am among them!
If even there are no more than a hundred, I brave Scylla still;
If ten remain, I shall be the tenth;
And is there remains only one, I shall be he.
Victor Hugo said that about a tyrant, of course, but it works with a lot of things, especially reading...
7Is it really the people? I am very surprised that the two Pulitzer Prize winners didn't think about faulty, government education system as the main culprit! When you focus on pushing ideology, group thinking , bring standards to the levels of the laziest students (they can't feel left out) ,allow disruptive students to stay in schools you get exactly that-mediocrity!
8I think that solid basic foundation in math, science and English plus encouragement of individual way of thinking and questioning would create new future leaders.
"...Our species is the only creative species, and it has only one creative instrument, the individual mind and spirit of a man. Nothing was ever created by two men."
John Steinbeck in "East of Eden"
Not all public schools are the same and they've been around for a very long time.
9The buildings have! Teachers and curriculum have changed though! More in some schools than others.
10The whole concept of public education has been around much longer than the buildings. Teachers and curriculum change all the time, in different ways, from county to county, state to state. Parents and voters influence that change.
11Well, we got what we voted for! Should illiterate and semi-litterate vote?
12They always have.
13Not just to argue randomly, but I think our schools are more a symptom than a cause - schools are at the mercy of voters/taxpayers and always have been. We can blame the government, but since we create our local, state and federal governments with our votes, we can't pretend 'the government' is an outside force. We chose it.
In the beginning, we choose the books, movies, tv shows and games our children are exposed to, which does influence their future choices. As entertainment consumers, we vote on what succeeds and what does not. If the intellectual level of the art we seek has declined, whose fault is that?
14There is no "right to vote" clause in our Constitution. Minimum criteria could be imposed. Same as for potential drivers. Should we allow blind people to drive?
15Do we really have a choice? Majority of our property taxes go to local shools. If the money was to follow the student instead, and parents would make the decision which school to send their children to,the quality of education in public schools would become dramatically better. (Sweden)
16Illiterate does not mean ignorant. What greater incentive for lowering school standards would there be than the possibility of controlling who votes?
17Exactly! You have 80 mln. voters capable of 4th. grade thinking. Do you think that they could vote for whom ever offers them "security" and promises to "take care" of them rather than for someone that challenges them to become self-reliant?
18If you control education you control the way people think! Look up some of Lenin's comments on importance of education in the ideological process.
Now I certainly agree that people should read more and our school systems need an overhaul. But seriously...how do they know this? How do they know how many books I've bought this year? I hate polls or whatever this is. Truly hate them. They are estimates and really rough ones at that.
Also, with statistics like that, I don't think it's taking into account what people are learning and reading on the internet. Plenty of people read news and learn about things they might not take the time to look up in the paper or in an encyclopedia.
The face of how people learn is changing. I'm not trying to diminish the threat of illiteracy, just pointing out that there are other factors that don't seem to have been taken into consideration.
19Reading and thinking are not the same.
Stupid people can read and brilliant people can't.
I think the article overstates the illiteracy rate in the U.S., which most sources I could find put it at about 14%.
No need to read Lenin on controlling the way people think, we've got plenty of people in the U.S. who have weighed in on that. We don't have a right to vote but we do have laws controlling literacy tests because they were abused by people who wanted to control voting by certain groups of people.
Harm, I'd bet the statistics cited come from here: http://www.humorwriters.org/startlingstats.html and they come from a publishing group. I read an article on why small bookstores fail so often a couple of years ago, and it did say a that about half of all Americans don't buy a book a year. Of course people could be using libraries, reading magazines etc., but I think the general point is that we're not a nation of readers.
Personally, I've always only skimmed newspapers and preferred books or magazines for news and information, and while I'm sure newspapers are up against it in a lot of ways, they also need to look to their own failings when trying to figure out why readers are walking away.
20Indeed! Reading and thinking are not the same. However, what you read and where you get your information affects the way you think. You are what you eat so maybe you are what you read!
21i always wondered why they use that "who bought a book this year" stat. my parents read more than anyone i know, and they never buy books, they go to the library. they are also very well educated, but according to this stat, they can't even read. makes no sense to me.
22I'm with your parents Snarky! I read about a book a week but I don't buy any of them
23If what you read determines what you think you were too impressionable to be trusted with a book.
24Hey Diamond Stephley! Whole day of thinking and you come up with this "profund" thought? C'mon people, lay off the cool-aid and start reading. These are some of the books that might be new to you all:
- Atlas shrugged-Ayn Rand
- The 5000 years leap
-Liberty vs. the Tyranny of Socialism by prof. Walter E.Williams (economist from Geoge Mason Univ.)
Don't be a "looter"! Any time Govt. spends "its" money, it was taken from somebody else. Just remember this everytime you ask for additional spending. Most of all, keep your mind open! I do! I don't have all the answers, but neither does the Government.
25Off to Church!
Atlas Shrugged is fiction.
26You know somersetva you're a guest in my group and I would appreciate if you would not be rude to my group members. There are ways to debate things without resorting to nastiness.
27You are absolutely right! My sincere appologies to "kastarte2" for my comment on other topic and staphley for questioning his thinking. Peace?
28Peace.
You are welcome to comment, we just try to keep it civil. Cheers!
29Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.