Huffington Post
Randall Bourscheidt
Arts Community to Obama: Here's What We're Fighting For
Everyone is looking for hope and leadership, and many Americans feel we have it in our President-elect. Many are comparing Barack Obama to some of the greatest leaders in American history, such as Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King, Jr.
When it comes to thinking about what the federal government can do for the arts, I share that hope but have another comparison in mind. There is a story that Winston Churchill proposed an increase in the British arts budget at the height of World War II. When challenged, he reportedly said, "I do it to remind us what we are fighting for."
We are fighting now to recover our prosperity but also our sense of purpose and pride as a nation. Like all other nations in history, our culture stands at the center of our identity, but it needs to be actively supported to flourish.
In the US we have a unique system in which private giving takes the lead in supporting the arts but government support provides a seal of honor by the public sector. Although funding for the National Endowment for the Arts is small compared to the massive investment many countries make in their own cultural life, it is symbolically and practically important, especially to smaller cultural institutions spread throughout the land.
As a candidate, Barack Obama offered a strong statement supporting increased funding for the NEA and for the National Endowment for the Humanities. Senator Obama also called for a new commitment to arts education, introducing young people to the diverse cultures of their country and helping the next generation of artists develop their talents. These are the bedrock of federal arts policy--and the legacy of enlightened thinking by presidents from Kennedy and Johnson to Nixon.
The Obama campaign statement on the arts offered hope in another area. He supported the idea of cultural diplomacy, with eased visa restrictions on foreign artists and a great effort to send artists around the world representing the US.
I hope we will see one other initiative from President Obama after January 20. If there is a federal public works program, it's important that it include building up the cultural infrastructure of communities, from libraries to museums and theaters. And the new administration could look to the WPA artists program for an example of how artists can be employed making these public works beautiful additions to cities and towns.
The Americans for the Arts reports that the arts employ 3 million people in the US. Think of what the arts do to bring hope to our people and to build a tolerant, civil society. President Obama should use the arts to build this new society.
Mishumo
French Connection
JC de CASTELBAJAC
I agree that greater government support for the arts and humanities would be an amazing step in the right direction.
1It's so important. Art may not feed our stomachs, but it feeds our minds and hearts. It affects our quality of life and serves as an escape when we need one.
2I believe art is also one of the most effective ways to inspire a sense of empathy with others and with the world and humanity at large. Especially fiction, but I might be biased because I'm a fiction writer
3Really Jude? That's awesome!
4Thanks
I haven't published for a while, but I hope I'll have something new in a few
months.
5I gather you are unaware that Abe Lincoln suspended Habeas corpus, and arrested and imprisoned without a trial,those that he considered a danger to the republic.
6Lincoln bashing? Seriously? How about some MLK bashing to go with that?
Anyway, why don't you focus on the substance and point of this post instead of the second sentence? Just sayin'.
7Not at all Lincoln bashing, He probably is our greatest president with Washington a close second. I am merely making an observation to those of you who thought George Bush was the ultimate evil, in the area of legal protection. I might also add, Lincoln just ignored the Supreme court when they told him he could not suspend Habeas Corpus. By the way I was part of that crowd you see in pictures of MLK in 1963. I worked for voter registration in black communities probably before you were even born.
8I still don't understand your point. Did either of us even mention Bush here?
Good for you for your work before I was born.
9Nobody mentioned Bush. This is a thread about the Arts. I'm not sure what your point is.
10he folowing statement was made: "Lincoln bashing? Seriously? How about some MLK bashing to go with that?" I was putting my comment into a context.
11he = The
12I made that statement because I didn't understand why you would choose to make that comment instead of something about the substance of the article.
13Gotcha, well if you don't mind I'd like to veer us back on topic since this is an extremely important issue for me being that I make my living in the performing arts.
14I think increased support for the arts goes hand in hand with improving the quality and standards of education; I'm saddened, for instance, that elementary and secondary schools tend to cut arts and creative programs. I really think those things are vitally important to a vibrant, healthy citizenry.
15I agree Jude. My early music education helped me in so many areas besides the obvious. It made me much better at math. Afterall music is mostly math. There are also so many studies that prove that children with early arts education end up succeeding better in school and out of it.
16Yep, me too, Harm. (I was an orchestra nerd, and played piano as well.) Music education also instills a lot of discipline and teaches the rewards of hard work--you can't cheat in a recital!
I also feel that creative writing and art classes are important in ways more than the obvious. They teach one how to organize one's thoughts and interpret the world around them in different ways. School shouldn't be all about memorizing stuff.
17My daughter got her undergraduate degree from "The Academy of Arts" in California. I fully understand the need for arts of all kinds to bringing a sense of satisfaction, well being, joy if you will to the soul. I think though the priority in elementary and secondary education should be placed on improving the math and reading scores, which are abysmal when compared to other countries. That does not mean to eliminate art and music from school programs, but art and music should not be a top priority right now. There is a limited amount of money that will be available to be spent on improving education, heck for improving anything in this country. it is all a matter of priorities.
18Yeah because really I can memorize anything for a short period of time (to get an A on a test for instance
) That doesn't mean I've learned a damn thing. The things that stick with me are presented in a different manner than "just memorize this text."
19Those are good points, but I honestly believe that early arts education enhances reading and math comprehension. In face I know it does. There have been studies done on it. Let me see if I can find them.
20I don't think arts and creative education are important only to bring satisfaction and well-being to the soul (hell, everything I write only brings me the opposite of those
). They're important in my opinion for the other benefits I mentioned.
21I have a granddaughter in middle school who plays the violin in the school orchestra.
22My mom was dead set against me playing violin, because she was convinced my head would be permanently tilted to the side (I convinced her to let me, though, and my head is still fairly straight on my neck).
23As a matter of fact the violin she plays was gift from my wife and me. It was made by a local artisan. It has a wonderful sound, and is just beautiful to look at. My wife can "noodle" out a tune if she has the music in front of her on the harp, guitar, piano, and violin. She prefers the harp.
24I'm sure having so much music in your life has enriched yours and your children's lives. They were lucky to be exposed to it.
I'm still looking for that study.
25Here are a couple:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2002-05-20-arts.htm
http://www.ijea.org/v2n8/
26To be honest I was more annoyed by my early arts education then anything else. Ballet I enjoyed, but I could've lived without music and drawing/painting always felt like a wast of time. I felt I could've been doing more math and science, but what I can't deny is the correlation between those who had, either by choice or force, early arts education and those who seek higher education. Most of the people who I go to school with played some sort of instrument or danced or something. You would have to detangle that from Socio-Economic Status, but even so I'm sure you would still see that correlation.
I came to art late, but now I do write and design costumes for a couple plays a year at my school. I do think by giving more money to early arts education you would give children more options. Not everyone likes music or visual arts, some kids are more adept at the performing arts and even foreign language.
27Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.